Historical Recap (10 minutes)
Key Takeaways from Last Week
Quick 2-minute sharing round - connect your chosen historical animator to a contemporary possibility you discovered.
Analysis Framework (15 minutes)
How to Read Animation as Art
Moving beyond "I like it" to understanding WHY and HOW animation creates meaning.
Material Analysis Questions
- What is the actual MEDIUM? (Digital files, physical materials, hybrid techniques?)
- How does the production method become part of the content?
- What does the frame rate communicate about time and perception?
- How do compression artifacts or digital noise function artistically?
- What platform constraints shape the work's form?
Historical Context Questions
- Which historical technique does this reference or rebel against?
- How does this work position itself within animation history?
- What contemporary issues does it address through animation?
- How does it use or subvert commercial animation conventions?
- What new possibilities does it suggest for the medium?
Conceptual Framework Questions
- What is animated and why? (Objects, ideas, processes, systems?)
- How does movement create meaning beyond mere decoration?
- What relationship does it establish between artist, work, and viewer?
- How does it engage with questions of labor, time, and craft?
- What does it reveal about our contemporary moment?
Digital Archaeology: Mapping Historical Techniques (20 minutes)
Your Contemporary Animation Toolkit
Every digital tool has historical DNA. Understanding lineages helps you make more intentional artistic choices.
Choose your favorite digital animation tool and trace its historical lineage:
- What physical animation technique does it digitize?
- What new possibilities does the digital version create?
- What limitations does it inherit from its analog predecessor?
- How could you use it in a way its creators never intended?
Time: 10 minutes individual work, 5 minutes sharing
Student Research Presentations (30 minutes)
Presentation Framework
Each student presents their chosen historical animator for 2 minutes, focusing on contemporary connections.
Presentation Structure
- Who was your chosen animator and what was their historical context?
- What was their signature technique or innovation?
- How could you adapt their technique using today's technology?
- What contemporary artist or project does their work remind you of?
- What would they think of animation today?
Take notes on connections between classmates' choices and potential collaboration opportunities.
Digital Archaeology of Your Work (20 minutes)
Excavating Your Current Practice
Before we can transform your work, we need to understand its current "archaeological layers" - what influences, techniques, and assumptions are embedded in your practice.
Analyze your most recent animation work:
- Material Layer: What software, hardware, and processes did you use? Why those choices?
- Reference Layer: What other animations influenced this work? (Even subconsciously)
- Platform Layer: Where was this meant to be seen? How did that shape your choices?
- Labor Layer: How much time did different parts take? What felt tedious vs. exciting?
- Historical Layer: What animation traditions does your work unknowingly participate in?
Time: 15 minutes individual reflection, write notes
Often we make choices unconsciously that reveal deeper artistic values and assumptions.
Transformation Exercises (25 minutes)
Applying Historical Innovations to Contemporary Work
Now we'll practice adapting historical techniques to transform your current animation practice.
Transform your work using McCay's interactive performance approach:
- How could you make your animation respond to live input? (Voice, movement, biometric data?)
- What would it mean to "perform" your animation rather than just screen it?
- How could you break the fourth wall between your work and its audience?
- Sketch a concept for an interactive version of your latest project
Time: 8 minutes
Apply Reiniger's craft-based, layered approach:
- How could you make your animation using physical materials first, then digitize?
- What would your work look like if you had to cut every element by hand?
- How could you embrace "slowness" and craft in digital tools?
- Design a workflow that combines physical and digital processes
Time: 8 minutes
Adopt McLaren's experimental, medium-specific approach:
- How could you animate without traditional animation software?
- What would it mean to create animation by manipulating code directly?
- How could you make the "errors" or "glitches" in your process become the art?
- Propose an experimental technique no one has tried before
Time: 9 minutes
Contemporary Applications (15 minutes)
Artists Who Are Already Doing This
Contemporary artists successfully adapting historical animation techniques for current practice.
McCay's Interactive Legacy
Reiniger's Craft Revival
Critique Methodology (15 minutes)
How to Give Useful Feedback on Animation Art
Moving beyond "I like it" to constructive analysis that helps artists develop their practice.
The Three-Layer Critique Method
- Surface Layer: What do you see/hear? Pure description without interpretation.
- Structure Layer: How is it made? What techniques, timing, and formal choices create the experience?
- Concept Layer: What is it exploring? How do the formal choices support or contradict the conceptual framework?
Productive Critique Questions
- What is this work's relationship to animation history?
- How could the maker push their technical approach further?
- What aspects of the work feel most/least resolved?
- What new directions does this suggest for the artist's practice?
- How does this work contribute to contemporary animation discourse?
Final Project Introduction (10 minutes)
The Historical Innovation Project
Your semester-long project: Create a significant animation work that meaningfully adapts a historical technique for contemporary practice.
Project Requirements
- Choose one historical animation technique as your foundation
- Develop an original adaptation using contemporary tools/concepts
- Create a 2-3 minute finished animation work
- Document your process and historical research
- Present your work in a final critique that connects historical and contemporary contexts
Evaluation Criteria
- Historical Understanding: Depth of research and understanding of chosen technique
- Contemporary Innovation: Originality and significance of your adaptation
- Technical Execution: Craft and skill in realizing your concept
- Conceptual Framework: Clarity of artistic vision and critical thinking
- Process Documentation: Quality of reflection and research presentation
Consider both what excites you conceptually and what seems feasibly achievable this semester.
Assignment for Next Week
Technique Adaptation Proposal
Deliverables
- Choose your historical technique and contemporary adaptation approach
- Create a 1-page written proposal outlining your concept
- Develop 3 different visual/technical tests exploring your chosen approach
- Document your process with photos, screenshots, or screen recordings
- Prepare a 3-minute presentation of your proposal and tests
Proposal Structure
- Historical Foundation: Which technique, why it interests you, key innovations
- Contemporary Adaptation: How you'll modernize/transform the approach
- Technical Plan: What tools, processes, and workflows you'll use
- Conceptual Framework: What you want to explore/express through this approach
- Timeline: Realistic schedule for developing this over the semester
Next Week Preview
Lecture 3: Technical Deep Dive
We'll examine your proposals and begin intensive technical workshops tailored to your chosen approaches. Come ready to get your hands dirty with both historical research and contemporary tool mastery.